Development Law Update


Development Law Update | Issue 2 – 2016

TOTAL OR PARTIAL DEMOLITION OF ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION: SCA CAUSES CONFUSION

BSB International Link CC v Readam South Africa (Pty) Limited

Recently in Lester v Ndlambe Municipality and another, the Supreme Court of Appeal held that a court hearing an application in terms of section 21 of the Building Regulations and Building Standards Act had no discretion but to order demolition of a building constructed without the required building approval, ie it could not order partial demolition but was compelled to order total demolition. This was so, the court emphasized, because the law could not and did not countenance an ongoing illegality which was also a criminal offence, and to do so would subvert the doctrine of legality and undermine the rule of law. In April 2016, however, the SCA seemed to say something different.

READ MORE

 

ZONING: DOES ‘INFORMAL HOUSING’ CONSTITUTE ‘DWELLING HOUSES’?

Educated Risk Investments 165 (Pty) Ltd v Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (308/2015) [2016] ZASCA 67 (20 May 2016)

The interests of a township developer and those of a local authority who uses a neighbouring (undeveloped) township for informal settlements, can be at odds, specifically in a society harshly divided along income lines. The Supreme Court of Appeal was asked to determine whether the informal housing constituted ‘dwelling houses’ as was prescribed by the relevant zoning scheme. It was also asked to address the question whether the local authority was obliged to comply with all the conditions of approval of the township or the sub-divisional conditions before permitting people to live there.

READ THE JUDGMENT
READ MORE

Development Law Update | Issue 1 – 2016

REDUCED RATES FOR HOA BECAUSE IT MAINTAINS ITS OWN INFRASTRUCTURE?

Blair Atholl Homeowners Association v The City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality (20634/2014) [2015] ZASCA 195 (1 December 2015)

The Housing Consumers Protection Measures Act requires that home builders must be registered with the Council as a measure to ensure that consumers are protected from shoddy building work. Here, the Court confirmed that since the builder was not registered with the Council, it could not succeed in its application to make an arbitrator’s award that was granted in its favour an order of Court.

READ MORE

 

REZONING APPROVAL AND 2 YEAR LAPSING PERIOD

Langebaan Ratepayers & Residents Association v Berrydust 69 CC and Another (15849/2015) [2015] ZAWCHC 183 (19 November 2015)

What triggers the lapsing of a rezoning in terms of section 16 of LUPO in circumstances where an appeal was lodged against the rezoning? Was it the date of the initial approval or the date of the MEC’s decision to dismiss the objection? The judgment provides a clear guideline how to address the position.

READ MORE

Development Law Update | Issue 2 – 2015

Demolish 5 of 9 Storeys

Aboobaker N.O and Others v Serengeti Rise Body Corporate and Another (12052/2014)

If a local authority and developer do not follow required notification procedures where a rezoning application is considered and subsequently building plans aligned to such rezoning are approved, property owners are not left without recourse, even if the building works had reached an advanced stage. The court here answered the affected owners’ call for review of the irregular decisions, in consequence of which it ordered demolition of the building work that was done subsequent to irregular municipal approvals.

READ MORE

 

Development Approvals Prior To Property Transfer

City of Cape Town Municipality Municipal Planning By-Law

In terms of the new planning laws effective in the City of Cape Town municipality from 1 July this year, the City can, on application, approve construction plans before the subdivision has been confirmed. Developers are at present however unable to submit any building plans prior to the confirmation, i.e. prior to the first unit in the subdivision being registered or transferred. The City is addressing the issue.

READ MORE

Development Law Update | Issue 1 – 2015

New Beginnings: SPLUMA and LUPA

Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act of 2013

Western Cape Land Use Planning Act of 2014 (link to be provided

The Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act of 2013 (SPLUMA) and Western Cape Land Use Planning Act of 2014 (LUPA) both came into operation on 1 July 2015. From a development law point of view, what do these two pieces of legislation look like and how do they link up? In this first of a three-part series, we provide a short summary of SPLUMA. The next articles will provide details of the practical application processes flowing from the adoption of these laws.

READ MORE

 

A New Development Law Unit and Law Update

STBB’s Development Law Unit came into existence in April this year and this is the first of the Unit’s new monthly newsletter which will provide a snapshot of important news, cases and legislative happenings reported each month and which impacts on development law, property and conveyancing.

How will the Unit function?

READ MORE

 

Constitutionally Unfair to Disallow Temporary Transfer of Irrigation Water Use?

Trustees of the Lucas Scheepers Trust v MEC for The Department of Water Affairs, Gauteng and Others (40514/2013) [2015] ZAGPPHC 211 (17 April 2015)

Does the Water Act allow the MEC to grant a temporary transfer of owner A’s right to irrigation water to owner B, for purposes of irrigation, where A and B reached agreement to this effect? And if not, does this infringe owner B’s constitutional rights? These were the issues tackled in this judgment.

READ MORE

 

Developer Selling Subdivided Township Land: Rates Clearance for Whole Mother ERF

EM And EM Engineering (Pty) Limited v KwaDukuza Municipality and Others (9349/2014) [2015] ZAKZDHC 55 (26 June 2015)

After registering a general plan for establishing a new residential township, the developer applied for a municipal clearance to effect transfer of two of the subdivided erven that were subsequently sold. The municipality issued figures in respect of the whole mother erf, arguing that mere registration of a plan did not mean that the subdivided erven existed individually, as there was no change in ownership. This judgment illustrates the correct approach.

READ MORE

LAW UPDATE : ISSUE 4

30 May 2013

EMPLOYEES OR INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS?

In a highly regulated labour environment, the legal nature of any form of service relationship is paramount in clarifying the rights and obligations afforded to the parties in terms of statutory requirements. While an employee, under defined circumstances, is entitled to the protection of our labour law and the benefits it provides (such as vacation leave, sick leave, family responsibility leave, overtime and the right not to be unfairly dismissed), an independent contractor is not afforded such rights. It is therefore crucial to determine whether you are ‘an employee’ or an ‘independent contractor’.

read more

Summary

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS REGARDING WILLS AND DECEASED ESTATES

Uncertainties can arise when structuring a will. You may wonder, for example: What happens to assets bequeathed to children who live overseas? What if I die without having drafted a will? How are my maintenance obligations to a divorced spouse dealt with? In the next few paragraphs we answer some frequently encountered questions to assist you in your planning.

read more

Summary